GE to make payments to U.S. government over delayed Baker Hughes divestiture
GE agreed to divest GE Water to resolve the Department’s competitive concerns with GE’s acquisition of Baker Hughes Incorporated.
As part of the original proposed settlement filed on June 12, 2017, GE committed to divest the worldwide assets of GE Water to SUEZ S.A., a leading global water and waste management company, by approximately the end of September 2017.
While GE has divested GE Water assets accounting for approximately 90 percent of GE Water’s revenues (including all assets in North America), it has not yet transferred to Suez legal title of GE Water assets in certain international jurisdictions due to various administrative challenges.
Delays are likely to push the divestiture in some international jurisdictions into 2018. In the meantime, GE has conferred beneficial ownership and operational control of the assets in these jurisdictions to Suez.
The Department filed a motion to enter a modified final judgment in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which the Court approved and signed yesterday. The Court Order contains two newly agreed-upon provisions of note.
First, in order to encourage GE to complete the divestitures promptly, the Court Order requires GE to begin making daily incentive payments as soon as January 1, 2018, until the divestitures in each international jurisdiction are completed.
Second, the Order reflects GE’s agreement to reimburse the United States for attorney’s fees and costs incurred in addressing these delays.
In moving the Court to approve the settlement and incentive payment structure, the Department explained that it only agrees to resolve the competitive concerns raised by a merger through a divestiture remedy “if it determines that the buyer of the divestiture assets will step seamlessly into the shoes of one of the merging parties and preserve the competition that otherwise would be lost due to the merger.”
To ensure that competition is preserved, merging companies must commit to completing the required divestiture in a timely fashion and, in return, they are allowed to consummate their merger before the divestiture is finalized.
In this case, GE signed a Hold Separate Stipulation and Order in which it agreed to make a prompt, complete divestiture and was allowed to consummate its merger with Baker Hughes on July 3.
However, GE is now unable to comply with the timing it committed to in its original settlement with the Department. ■