POST Online Media Lite Edition



 

Banks need more people to prepare for tougher stress tests

Staff writer |
A new report from PwC has revealed that banks do not have enough employees dedicated to preparing for tougher regulatory stress tests.

Article continues below






The report, Passing the stress test, based on a global survey of 24 mainly non-US banks, found that, overall, participating banks are confident that they meet current regulatory requirements but that they underestimate the amount of resource needed to meet the demands of a tougher regulatory stress testing regime.

90% of respondents have fewer than 20 people dedicated to stress tests. This is less than half of that typically seen in comparable US banks (some US banks have significantly more), which have increased staff levels in response to demands imposed by the Federal Reserve. None of the respondents to the survey planned to recruit more than 20 people to work on stress testing in the next three years.

Most respondents acknowledge additional investment will be required. Only 13% of respondents reported they already have sufficient, adequately skilled staff to conduct regulatory stress testing with most others citing some gaps in existing staff capabilities and, more typically, numbers.

Keith Ackerman, partner at PwC, said: "The way global banks prepare for stress testing needs to change. Past experience has shown that very demanding regulatory stress testing regimes require larger teams with the appropriate skills to deliver value.

"In order to meet future regulatory demands, banks need to move regulatory stress testing from a standalone process to one that has more resource and is integrated with other parts of the business and its strategy. Banks face a complex challenge in simultaneously managing the delivery of stress tests and improvements to their stress testing processes, made more challenging by the changing regulatory landscape."

While Boards and senior management are heavily involved at the results stage, they are rarely involved in the end to end process of stress testing. This means they are likely to fall short of the increasing regulatory requirement for more comprehensive involvement.

Results could have wider use in informing and managing the business: while banks agree regulatory stress tests provide useful insights, 95% have never or rarely revised business plans in response.


What to read next

All seven UK banks pass BoE stress tests
All 31 U.S. major banks pass Fed stress test
Fed gives big U.S. banks a green light for buyback, dividend plans