Proposed generics labeling could cost health care $4 billion
The FDA's Proposed Rule would permit generic drug manufacturers to initiate changes to their labels, which they currently are prohibited from doing. The agency insists that the rule would "generate little cost," but MGA finds that it would dramatically alter the legal and financial landscape for generic manufacturers and suddenly expose them to product liability lawsuits.
"The Proposed Rule would add significant costs to the U.S. health care system by raising the cost of generic drugs. These additional costs will ultimately be borne by payors and patients," noted economist Alex Brill, CEO of MGA and author of the study.
The analysis finds that generic product liability would increase annual spending on generic drugs by $4 billion, or $1.16 per prescription for the roughly 3.4 billion generic prescriptions dispensed in the U.S. each year.
Of this, government health programs would shoulder $1.5 billion, and private health insurance and the uninsured would bear $2.5 billion. Given expected increases in pharmaceutical spending, the economic impact of the Proposed Rule would increase over time.
"Higher insurance premiums, self-insurance costs, and reserve spending on product liability will likely force generic drug manufacturers to raise prices, thereby tempering consumer savings and adversely affecting patient access. Generic manufacturers also may exit or decline to enter the market for products with greater liability risk," said Brill.
The MGA analysis also highlights the likelihood that generic manufacturers would be compelled to overwarn about side effects in their labels to protect themselves from litigation. Overwarning can cause confusion for health care providers and patients in selecting appropriate medication. ■