The Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced it filed a civil enforcement action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona against Debiex.
Article continues below
The complaint alleges Debiex used popular romance scam tactics to fraudulently misappropriate $2.3 million in customer funds intended for digital asset commodity trading.
The CFTC’s complaint alleges Debiex’s unidentified officers and/or managers cultivated friendly or romantic relationships with potential customers by communicating falsehoods to gain trust, and then solicited them to open and fund trading accounts with Debiex.
From approximately March 2022 through the present, it’s alleged Debiex accepted and misappropriated approximately $2.3 million from approximately five customers as part of this scheme.
In its continuing litigation against Debiex, the CFTC seeks restitution to defrauded customers, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, civil monetary penalties, trading bans, and a permanent injunction against further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC regulations.
As alleged in the complaint, Debiex operated publicly accessible internet domains located at https://www.debiex.com and/or https://www.debiex.net, which were created around March 12, 2022 and are accessible to customers in the United States.
Debiex used the websites to target Asian Americans with a sophisticated fraudulent scheme involving purported digital asset commodity trading.
As detailed in the complaint, the scheme involved the coordinated efforts of three groups (1) “solicitors,†who contacted customers via at least one U.S.-based social media platform and pretended to befriend or romance the customers to solicit them to open and fund trading accounts with Debiex; (2) “customer service,†which purported to set up and service Debiex trading accounts on behalf of the customers; and (3) “money mules,†such as, but not limited to, Zhang, whose digital asset wallets were used by Debiex to accept and/or misappropriate customer funds.
Money mules are people who, at someone else’s direction, receive and move money obtained through fraud or other crimes.
As further alleged, instead of using the funds to trade on behalf of the customers, as promised, Debiex misappropriated the customers’ digital assets.
Unbeknownst to the customers, and as alleged, the Debiex websites merely mimicked the features of a legitimate live trading platform and the “trading accounts†on the websites were a complete ruse. No actual trading took place on the customers’ behalf. ■