POST Online Media Lite Edition



 

Trivago loses appeal in Australia after misleading consumers over hotel ads

Christian Fernsby |
The Full Federal Court has dismissed an appeal by hotel comparison site Trivago against an earlier decision which found Trivago had breached the Australian Consumer Law by making misleading representations about hotel room rates on its website and television advertising.

Article continues below



Topics: TRIVAGO   

In January 2020, the Federal Court had ruled that Trivago had misled consumers by representing its website would quickly and easily help users identify the cheapest rates available for a given hotel.

The judge at first instance had found that Trivago did not sufficiently disclose to users that its website used an algorithm that gave prominence to accommodation providers paying Trivago a higher payment fee (cost per click), meaning that the most prominent offers were often not the cheapest offers for consumers.

The primary judge also found that Trivago misled consumers through the use of strike through prices and text in different colours because Trivago often compared the rate for a standard room with the rate for a luxury room at the same hotel.

On 4 November, the Full Federal Court upholds the primary judge’s decision that Trivago’s website representations misled consumers.

“This is an important warning to comparison sites that they must not mislead consumers about the results they recommend,” ACCC Chair Rod Sims said.

“We brought this case because we were concerned that consumers were being misled by Trivago’s claims that their site was getting the best deal for consumers, when in fact they were shown the deals that benefited Trivago.”

“Trivago’s conduct meant that consumers may have paid more for a room at a hotel than they should have, and hotels lost business from direct bookings despite offering a cheaper prices,” Mr Sims said.

The matter will now return to the primary judge, who will consider the orders sought by the ACCC against Trivago at a later date. The ACCC is seeking orders for declarations, injunctions, penalties and costs.


What to read next

Google to stop scanning email for ads data
Radisson Hotel Group boosts its African development, signing 11 new hotels
Federal consumer protection bureau goes after PayPal for $25 million