POST Online Media Lite Edition


Netherlands fines Samsung over 39 million euros for influencing the online prices of television sets

Christian Fernsby |
The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) imposes a fine of over 39 million euros on Samsung Electronics Benelux.

Article continues below

From January 2013 through December 2018, Samsung exercised undue influence on the online retail prices of television sets of seven retailers.

Samsung monitored the online retail prices of retailers in an automated manner using so-called web crawlers. If Samsung saw prices that were lower than its desired market price, it contacted those retailers and urged them to increase their prices.

WhatsApp messages and emails that ACM collected during dawn raids revealed that, in those interactions, Samsung often informed them that it had urged or would urge other retailers in a similar manner: “all other partnered parties have been advised.”

Retailers replied to Samsung that they had increased the price: “Done, visible in 15 min”. Conversely, the retailers asked Samsung to confront retailers that used too low prices. This often happened by using screenshots. Samsung regularly acted on such complaints, and informed the complaining retailers: “Advised”, or: “Ugh. Will do something about this… again.”

As Samsung constantly informed these retailers, they knew that they would not price themselves out of the market if they followed Samsung’s price. In that way, Samsung unduly intervened directly in the competition between retailers.

Prices of new television models quickly drop after their introductions on the market. Samsung sought to counter this process by coordinating prices with retailers. Through this price coordination, Samsung protected its own margins as well as the retailers’ margins at the expense of consumers.

Every retailer must set their own retail prices. Monitoring online retail prices by suppliers is, in and of itself, allowed. Suppliers can also give retailers non-binding price recommendations.

However, suppliers that influence the prices of retailers by, for example, informing those retailers about the planned prices of competitor retailers go too far. The same goes for retailers complaining to suppliers about the retail prices used by other retailers. Suppliers must ignore such complaints.

What to read next

Samsung Heavy Industries to pay $75 million fine to resolve foreign bribery case
Samsung Securities fined $128,500, imposed suspension over dividend fiasco
Samsung's Lee sentenced to 5 years in prison