U.S. files another complaint against UnitedHealth Group
The complaint alleges UHG knowingly obtained inflated risk adjustment payments based on untruthful and inaccurate information about the health status of beneficiaries enrolled in UHG’s Medicare Advantage Plans throughout the United States, the Justice Department announced.
This action follows the government’s filing of a complaint earlier this month in United States ex rel. Swoben v. Secure Horizons, a related action that also alleges that UHG submitted false claims for payment to the Medicare Program.
“The Department of Justice’s pursuit of this matter illustrates its firm commitment to ensure the integrity of the Medicare Program, including those parts of the program that rely on the services of Medicare Advantage Organizations,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Chad A. Readler of the Justice Department’s Civil Division.
UHG is the nation’s largest Medicare Advantage Organization, with more than 50 Medicare Advantage and Drug Prescription plans providing healthcare services and prescription drug benefits to millions of Medicare beneficiaries throughout the United States receives a monthly “risk adjustment” payment from Medicare for each enrolled beneficiary.
The risk adjustment payments are based, in significant part, on the health status of the beneficiary, which are reflected by diagnosis that receives from treating physicians and subsequently submits to Medicare for each beneficiary.
The complaint filed today by the United States alleges that UHG knowingly disregarded information about beneficiaries’ medical conditions, which increased the risk adjustment payments UHG received from Medicare.
In particular, the lawsuit contends that, for many years, UHG conducted a national Chart Review Program designed to identify additional diagnoses not reported by treating physicians that would increase UHG’s risk adjustment payments.
However, UHG allegedly ignored information from these chart reviews showing that hundreds of thousands of diagnoses provided by treating physicians and submitted by it to Medicare were invalid and did not support the Medicare payments it had previously requested and obtained.
By ignoring this information, UHG avoided repaying Medicare monies to which it was not entitled.
The complaint also alleges that UHG ignored information about invalid diagnoses from health care providers with financial incentives to furnish such diagnoses.
These providers received payments from UHG tied to the amount of payments that UHG received from Medicare, and thus benefitted financially from any increase in Medicare payments resulting from the diagnoses they provided.
UHG allegedly knew that its financial arrangements with these providers created a strong incentive for and increased the risk of these providers to report invalid diagnoses. UHG’s own reviews of these providers’ medical records confirmed that the providers were reporting invalid diagnoses.
But upon obtaining such evidence, UHG knowingly avoided further efforts to identify invalid diagnoses from these providers and repay Medicare monies to which neither it nor these providers were entitled. ■