If a sales agent brings their customer a small gift, the customer is much more likely to make a purchase, a study by the university of Zurich has shown.
Article continues below
This works particularly well when the person receiving the gift is the boss.
The fact that even small gifts can result in conflicts of interest has implications for the debate about where the line should be drawn between tokens of appreciation and attempted bribery.
The offering of a gift—a sign of gratitude for a good business relationship, or a bribe? It's a fine line that is often hard to judge.
In many industries and companies, there are guidelines on the size and value of presents that employees are allowed to accept.
Such limits are based on the assumption that small gifts are unproblematic but more valuable gifts lead to conflicts of interest for the recipients and influence their decisions. A box of chocolates? No problem. A seat in a box at a Formula 1 race? Perhaps not.
In a controlled field experiment carried out in pharmacies and drugstores, Michel Marechal and Christian Thoeni of the universities of Zurich and Lausanne investigated whether small presents in business relationships really had no influence on the behavior of the recipient.
In the experiment, sales representatives gave some of their customers six tubes of toothpaste worth a total of around 10 francs. This seemingly insignificant token led to orders that were on average almost twice as high.
Effect depends on the relationship
This effect only occurred, however, if there was an existing business relationship, meaning the giver and recipient already knew each other.
If a gift was given at the first encounter, it was more likely to have the opposite effect: The amount ordered in this case tended to be lower than when no gift was given.
"Turning up with a gift right at the beginning of a business relationship may seem calculating, and is therefore counterproductive," remarks UZH Professor Michel Marechal on the finding. "But if there is already a relationship, the customer perceives the gift as a token of thanks and an indication that the relationship is appreciated."
Distributing small presents may therefore be a profitable strategy for sales reps. This is especially true if they are handed over personally to the boss.
In the experiment, if the gift was given directly to a shop manager, the value of the order increased more than four times, from an average of 61 francs to 271 francs. With ordinary employees, however, no effect was seen.
This can be explained by the fact that the managers generally have greater decision-making powers and can make larger orders without having to ask someone else.
"They also bear the most risk, however, which makes it surprising that they were willing to order so many products," says Christian Thoeni of the University of Lausanne.
The two authors of the study believe that the effect could be further increased if employees have decision-making power, but at the same time bear little risk.
Are limits of any use?
Marechal and Thoeni's findings offer new insights in the debate about the extent and purpose of limits on gift-giving in business relationships.
"Our study shows that the type of relationship between the business partners plays an important role, and that even small gestures can be interpreted as personal favors which one repays with a return favor," summarizes Marechal. "The debate about regulations and industry guidelines to tackle corruption has so far not sufficiently taken into account the effects of such small gifts." ■