Consumers remain highly skeptical of the vaccine
The co-analysis shows a disconnect between media and consumers: while media reports this season focused on the vaccine's efficacy compared to last year's, most commenters in online forums still held very deep reservations about side effects, mistrust of government vaccine recommendations, and so-called "Big Pharma" profit motives.
The media's positive push of the flu shot didn't seem to affect consumers' discussions online, either, as consumers didn't regularly source media articles within posts.
In fact, only 38 percent of consumers surveyed said they heard last year's flu shot was less effective than normal, and only 24 percent said the reason they didn't get the flu shot was because of efficacy concerns.
The number one reason surveyed consumers said they didn't get the flu shot this year was because they are concerned about side effects.
Effectiveness was the most-mentioned issue in media coverage, followed by accessibility and children's related issues.
The doctor's office is still the location of choice to get the flu shot: 49 percent of those surveyed who got the flu shot went to see their doctor, followed by 19 percent at the pharmacy, 15 percent at place of employment and 11 percent at a health clinic.
There's little brand recognition among flu shot brands: 79 percent of those surveyed who go the flu shot this year didn't know the name of the vaccine they received.
Age is a driving factor in getting a flu shot: 50 percent of those surveyed who got the flu shot this year, but didn't last year, were over 55.
Those who get the flu shot are committed it to year after year: 71 percent of those surveyed who got the flu shot this year, also got the flu shot last year.
The Associated Press published the most articles about the flu shot, while California and Pennsylvania were the two states that featured the most coverage. ■